When we are trying to evaluate art, how do we know it is good or not? We usually fit our personal feelings to the good or bad decision. If the drawing is in my taste, I say it is good. If it is not my taste, I dislike it and give it a negative comment. Everyone's thinking is different. Thus we may receive hundred or thousand different kinds of opinion toward one event or object. It is important for us to know that every opinion is independent and is not absolute. After reading the article, I realized there is no absolute good or bad. Comment, literarily defined, is opinion given briefly in speech or writing about an event. It is a form of personal feedback. The feedback, however, can be based on a personal experience or knowledge.
Experience and knowledge can only increase in amount. Experience is personal and independent. Everyone has different experience, no matter what the experience is: learning experience, sexual experience, entertaining experience or love experience. Experience is based on a person's life. Does that mean an older human has greater personal experience? Theoretically, it is. We see that we usually find an adult's suggestion is much more ideal than a child's. When we are judging with our experience, we are actually doing comparison. We are asking ourselves several questions. Is it better than what I had seen before? Is it creative? Can it be better? Is it professional?
However, not all of our experience is good. There are bad memories. Our judgement is therefore wrong. Thus, we have to aware that our opinion does not have a mean of absolute. It is also important to determine with another factor, knowledge.
Knowledge is from experience. It can be gained through experience. It can be gained through learning in a form of official education. Knowledge, similar to experience, can vary according to ages. Again, an old man is theoretically wiser. However, there are many exceptions to this case. When we think of knowledge, we should not restrict the area of it. Knowledge is wide and has no limitation. Knowledge is more than what we learn from school or even University. When we are judging, we also ask ourselves several questions. Does it fit what I had learned before? Is it using any sort of method I had learned before, or a new way? When we are lack of knowledge, we have difficulty evaluating. Our point of view is, therefore, limited and narrow. Our empty mind can only accept or learn, and everything will sound new to us. When we declare something new, psychologically we will think it is good. Good or bad does not make any sense here. When lack of knowledge, judgement is difficult and therefore cannot be said absolute.
Since knowledge and experience are important on our basis of decision, it is obvious that we have to learn and experience more in our life. The more you experience, the more you learn. The more you learn, the more you know. The more you know, the better you can judge. When we are judging, we should not think our judgement is absolutely right or wrong. There is no absolute right or wrong. It is like an ugly female or male can be considered beautiful in someone's eyes.
--------------------------------------------------------------