"Has been a lifesaver so many times!"
- Catherine Rampell, student @ University of Washington
"Exactly the help I needed."
- Jennifer Hawes, student @ San Jose State
"The best place for brainstorming ideas."
- Michael Majchrowicz, student @ University of Kentucky
The Postal Monopoly
In the United States economy most markets can be classified
into four different markets structures. But, each and every market in
the United States is completely unique from the others. Generally the
best type of market structure for the general public is per-fect
competition because it creates the lowest possible price for the
public. There are some exceptions were perfect competition isn�t the
best choice for the public on account of various reasons. The United
States Postal Service is one of them and since the Postal Service is a
monopoly, it is its own market. This paper will discuss the budget
dilemmas that the postal service has faced for the past twenty years
and if it is in the best interest of the economy for the United States
Postal Service to continue as a monopoly.
The first time there was talk of privatizing the Postal
Service was in 1979 when the Postal Service was losing vast amounts of
money in the long run. But since the Postal Service is a necessity for
America, the government had to subsidize the service in order for it
to continue in operation. In 1979 the United States Postal Service had
a cash flow of $22.5 Billion and was additionally receiving $176
million from investing(#1, Intro). Even with this added revenue the
Postal Service was still greatly under funded on its own (#1, Intro).
During this time it was discussed to privatize the postal service and
introduce competition because of the extreme losses that the service
was experiencing. A positive argument for privatizing the Postal
Service was with numerous competitors in the market there would be
more efficiency and the public would receive lower prices. But this
would also increase the usage of resources, for example airplanes and
cars. One of the problems the Post Office had was its receipts from
consumer purchases that were submitted the next day after the
transaction (#1, i). If the receipts were submitted earlier the postal
service would receive more money because they could invest that money
sooner (#1, i). Another way the Postal Service could increased
profits was by competitively selecting banks that would give them
higher interest rates and such (#1, ii). Probably the most relevant
and final way to improve the budget of the Postal Service is to
improve the bookkeeping poli-cies and banking techniques (#1, ii).
Not only did the Post Service propose to increase profits but
they also proposed to cut costs in a number of ways. There were three
methods that were proposed in 1946 for the protection of salaries that
no longer exists (#2, Intro). These have to do with the rural mail
carriers. Under this antiquated method of delivering mail the Postal
Service was los-ing money to any mail that went to "rural" areas (#2,
i) There are 48,000 mail carriers that deliver mail to millions of
families that are considered to be living in rural settings; this
costs the postal Service 858 million dollars a year (#2, i). This is a
fairly easy problem to fix considering how much money is being lost.
It was proposed that money loss could be significantly cut down if the
Postal Service corrected the following problems. The rural mail
carriers were assigned a certain amount of time to deliver to a
specific rural area, this method was out of date and because of this
the carriers have free time for which they got paid for (#2, ii). The
next problem was that other mail routes based pay on how many miles
the route covered, so the carriers were getting paid by the mile (#2,
iii). With this problem fixed the Postal Service could saved 26.8
million a year (#2, iii). There was also an hourly rate that was in
effect which indirectly promoted inefficient service (#2, iii). A stop
to this could have saved the Postal Service $255,000 a year (#2, iii).
From the num-bers mentioned above, it can be seen why the United
States Postal Service was losing so much money.
These problems did indeed eventually did get solved over the
past fifteen years and now the Postal Service is making record
breaking profits. Now in the first quarter of the fiscal year 1996 the
Postal Service already has a
View Full Essay
United States Postal Service, Mail, Advertising mail, Monopoly, Rural letter carrier, Post Office Ltd, Canada Post, Postal Regulatory Commission
More Free Essays Like This