"The current method of selecting nominees is unsatisfactory." We feel the there needs to be a decrease in the proportion of superdelegates and caucuses, increase proportional representation, and get rid of the winner take all system in the caucuses.
The Presidential selection process has changed significantly since George Washington was elected to his first term in 1789. When the political parties formed in 1790, they faced logistical problems of how to nominate candidates for president and vice-president. When travel was difficult, the practical solution was to have each party’s members in Congress, who were in the capital, choose the nominees. The Federalist party was the first political party to hold a congressional caucus. In creating the Electoral college, the constitutional convention explicitly rejected a proposal to have Congress elect the President. The Electoral College is still the center of the system, but all the related institutions and processes have changed dramatically. This is because the Constitution is so vague. It contains no provisions for organizing political parties, nominating candidates or campaigning for office. The Framers, assumed, incorrectly of course, that the selection process would be a reasonable one that would transcend partisanship. The original provision for balloting by the Electoral College was flawed and had to be superseded by the 12th Amendment, which stated "Electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and vice-president.
Modern Presidential campaigns vast and complex operations costing many millions of dollars. Their expense contrasts sharply with the convictions expressed in 1828 by John Qunicy Adams " to pay money for securing [the presidency of the United States] is incorrect in principle."

The apparent existence of running for President owes to a variety of factors, many of which did not exist at the time of Adams Presidency:
· highly competitive political parties
· development of costly communications, campaign technology, and specialists
· extensive suffrage
the introduction of national nominating conventions and primary elections.
Money is important in politics as in everything else, but it is not obvious that the candidate with the most money wins or that the donors of many by themselves favor in exchange for big bucks.