Stephen Leasock\'s "Arcadian Adventures With the Idle Rich": Satire

Jonathan Swift has suggested that "Satire is a sort of Glass, wherein
Beholders do generally discover every body\'s Face their own; which is the chief
reason...that so few are offended with it." Richard Garnett suggests that,
"Without humour, satire is invictive; without literary form, [and] it is mere
clownish jeering." (Encyclopaedia Britannica 14th ed. vol. 20 p. 5). Whereas
Swift\'s statement suggests that people are not offended by satire because
readers identify the character\'s faults with their own faults; Garnett suggests
that humour is the key element that does not make satire offensive. With any
satire someone is bound to be offended, but the technique the author uses can
change something offensive into something embarrassing.
Stephen Leacock\'s Arcadian Adventures with the Idle Rich is a
nonthreatening, humorous, and revealing satire of the moral faults of upper
class society. The satire acts as a moral instrument to expose the effect money
can have on religion, government, and anything within its touch. Writing about
such topics is hard to do without offending people. Leacock\'s technique combines
money with humour, and accompanies his moral message with ironic characters;
their exaggerated actions, and a constant comical tone to prevent readers from
being offended.
Leacock\'s utopian world is filled with humorous labels that represent the
"Plutonian\'s" personalities. "Ourselves Monthly"; a magazine for the modern
self-centered, is a Plutonian favourite. To fill their idle days, the Plutonian
women are in an endless search for trends in literature and religion. Without
the distractions of club luncheons and trying to achieve the "Higher
Indifference", the women would have to do something productive. Readers that
identify themselves with the class of people the Plutonians represent would be
embarrassed rather than offended by Leacock\'s satirical portrayal of them.
"The Yahi-Bahi Oriental Society" exaggerates the stupidity of the
Plutonians to a point where the reader laughs at the character\'s misfortunes.
The con men give ridiculous prophecies such as "Many things are yet to happen
before others begin." (Leacock 87), and eventually take their money and jewelry.
The exaggeration increases the humour while the moral message is displayed.
The characters of the novel are ironic in the sence that they percieve
themselves as being the pinicle of society, yet Leacock makes the look like
fools. For someone who prides themself on being an expert on just about
everything, Mr. Lucullus Fyshe\'s (as slimmy and cold as his name represents)
perceptions are proven false. Mr. Fyshe makes hypocratic statments about ruling
class tyranny, while barking down the neck of a poor waiter for serving cold
Leacock exposes the whole Plutonian buisness world to be fools by the their
encounter with Mr. Tomlinson. A man who knows live-stock; not stock market, is
percieved as a finacial genius. When Mr. Tomlinson replies that he does know
about an investment, the Plutonian reaction is:

"He said he didn\'t Know!" repeated the listener, in a
tone of amazement and respect. "By Jove! eh? he said
he didn\'t know! The man\'s a wizard!"
"And he looked as if he didn\'t!" went on Mr. Fyshe.
(Leacock 47)

After Mr. Tomlinson is discovered to be a plain farmer, and his fortune falls,
the Plutorians are seen eating their words:

"Now , \'I said , for I wanted to test the fellow, \'tell
me what that means?\' Would you believe me, he looked
me right in the face in that stupid way of his, and he
said, \'I don\'t know!\'"
"He said he didn\'t know!" repeated the listener
contemptuously; "the man is a fool!" (leacock 66)

On Plutoria avenue money makes the man and the fool.
Worth and expense are important for the inhabitants of Plutoria avenue.
Even the birds are "the most expensive kind of birds" (Leacock 7). The innocents,
Mr. Tomlinson and his family, show that for Plutorians personal worth is based
on the amount of money an individual has. The media builds up Mr. Tomlinson to
be a financial genius, because of his great amount of money and his mysterious
look. His "look" is a confused man caught in a world of which he has no
understanding, but the money makes him the "Great dominating character of the
newest and highest finance." (Leacock 36). Mr. Tomlinson\'s wife is described by
the media as setting new trends, and shaking the fashion world. She could have
worn a garbage bag in public, and probably received the same review. Leacock
exaggerates the obsession of money to a humorous point that not even religion is
Religion is a social event